Despite what this guy says, if there’s one thing I’ve never been able to figure out about men’s taste in women, it’s what makes a ‘good butt’. I’ve never really been a butt man myself – as long as it’s tight and proportional with the girl’s body, I’m happy. But when it comes to which models ‘butt men’ say have a good butt, I am totally perplexed.For example, take the two Asian models who are most famous for having a ‘great butt’: Linda Tran and KT So. For me, Linda’s butt is nothing special at all: I’ve seen many, many Asian girls who are built like this. Indeed, for my taste it isn’t even what I would consider to be a good butt, as I feel it is simply too big in proportion with her upper body. But this is a subjective judgement of course!
On the other hand, KT So’s butt could hardly be more different. Her’s is actually quite petite, and for me in proportion with the rest of her body. But even though I like her butt (in as much as like any butt), I still don’t think it’s anything special: once again, I’ve seen many trim and taut girls who are built like this. And given that Linda’s and KT’s butts have almost nothing in common (apart from being tight), how can they both be considered to be great butts?
As far as I can see, the only consistent factor between what butt men consider to be good butts (apart from being tight) is simply which models happen to show them off! Perhaps I should take more butt shots of Sachiko to cater to this market? Am I missing something? If so, please enlighten me in the comments, especially if you’re a butt man yourself!
NOTE: This is the first in what will be a series of “Dr. Lee’s Talking Point” articles, discussing the biological, sociological and psychological bases of our wildly varying sexual preferences. And before anyone asks, the model in the picture above is of course Sachiko McLean.
